Skip to content

NDepend User Voice

Welcome to the NDepend User Voice page. Let us know what you would like to see in future versions of NDepend. This site is for suggestions and ideas. If you need to report a bug, please send us an email at support@ndepend.com

We look forward to hearing from you!

Thanks – Patrick Smacchia
NDepend Team

NDepend Users Voice

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

3 results found

  1. Allow Implements to take a variable

    It would be great to enable IType.Implement to allow passing an IType.Name instead of a string literal. That way this query would actually be possible where I am trying to get all classes that implement all interfaces. I can then check for unused interfaces.

    let deps = new Func<IType, IEnumerable<IType>>(
    t => from c in Types where c.Implement(t.FullName) select c
    )

    let allInterfaces = (from t in Types
    where t.IsInterface
    && (t.IsPublic || t.IsInternal)
    select t)

    from t in allInterfaces
    let dependencies = deps(t)
    select new { t, dependencies}

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  1 comment  ·  Code Rule and Query  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  2. Let queries pull data from other queries

    Logically, parts of queries can be shared between queries. For example, both "Types that could have a lower visibility" and "Potentially dead Types" need to ignore classes with only const fields. I would like queries to be able to build on the results of other queries, much as C# methods reduce code duplication by using other methods.

    12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Code Rule and Query  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  3. Add possibility to create CQL Rules about method parameters and variable naming conventions

    Make it possible to create a rule about method parameters & variable names.
    It does not seem to be supported now.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Code Rule and Query  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
  • Don't see your idea?

NDepend User Voice

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)