NDepend User Voice
Welcome to the NDepend User Voice page. Let us know what you would like to see in future versions of NDepend. This site is for suggestions and ideas. If you need to report a bug, please send us an email at email@example.com
We look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks – Patrick Smacchia
2 results found
Add importance weighting to rules for more robust "fails"
Instead of a binary critical or not critical flag for rules, it would be nice to have a weighting system for rules (e.g. "each violation of this rule is worth 3, but each violation of this important rule is worth 8").
Then perhaps we could assign a threshold for whether our analysis failed based on point totals, or some percentage formula.1 vote
with the technical debt support of v2017 that let’s assign a cost-to-fix and a severity estimation for each issue
Description and Code for Avoid methods with too many parameters Do Not Match
The description of rule Avoid methods with too many parameters says "This rule matches methods with more than 8 parameters.". The source code finds all methods with greater than 6 parameters.
warnif count > 0 from m in JustMyCode.Methods where
m.NbParameters >= 71 vote
- Don't see your idea?