Skip to content

NDepend User Voice

Welcome to the NDepend User Voice page. Let us know what you would like to see in future versions of NDepend. This site is for suggestions and ideas. If you need to report a bug, please send us an email at support@ndepend.com

We look forward to hearing from you!

Thanks – Patrick Smacchia
NDepend Team

NDepend Users Voice

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

44 results found

  1. I would like to be able to easily remove all default NDepend keyboard shortcuts in VS

    I would like to be able to easily remove all default NDepend keyboard shortcuts in Visual Studio.

    NDepend shortcuts seem to be all based on using the Alt key and set at the Global scope, to they regularly conflict with the keyboard shortcuts on tool windows in VS. An example of this is the Find in Files window - I cant hit Alt+A to click the Find All button because NDepend has globally mapped that to some element search tool that I dont need or want to use.

    There are many NDepend commands and its really tedious to unmap them…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  3 comments  ·  Visual Studio Integration  ·  Admin →

  2. Ignore "Avoid having different types with same name" rule for extension classes

    For static classes that only contain extension methods for a particular type, often the class name is in the format of "[Type]Extensions". These classes are most often transparent to the consuming code, and so the reasoning behind the critical rule "Avoid having different types with same name" need not apply, and certainly should not be critical.

    "Such practice leads confusion and also naming collision in source files that use different types with same name."

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Code Rule and Query  ·  Admin →

  3. Update .NET Profile Directory Resolution

    When using a .NET Profile, the NuGet packages directory stored in the <Dirs> element of the project is fully resolved to include the username. This poses a problem when committing the ndproj file to source control since the project settings are specific to a developer machine. It would be better to use %userprofile% instead:
    %userprofile%\.nuget\packages

    Even further, would it be best to just store the .NET Profile configuration itself in the ndproj project file instead of the corresponding paths? The resolved paths could possibly be saved in the suo file instead. This would also help resolve issues when there are…

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  NDepend Project  ·  Admin →

  4. Do not open all kinds of (tool) windows when/after running analysis

    I prefer to open/select and postion the windows when and how myself.
    I often do not need or want to view the default windows opened and it creates a kind of restlessness in the UI.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  UI - Ergonomy  ·  Admin →

  5. DebtSettings handling when SettingsFilePath is set

    When storing debt settings in an external .ndsettings file, the settings are still pulled in to the ndproj file when the first scan is run. There should be an option to prevent these settings from being copied into the ndproj file. When managing ndproj files using source control, this would lead to fewer changes since the when the external ndsettings file is changed, it would not impact the ndproj files referencing it.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  NDepend Project  ·  Admin →

  6. Remove storage of assembly names from NDepend project file

    When NDepend analysis is run for the first time, it adds a list of framework assemblies to the ndproj file, in the <FrameworkAssemblies> section. There doesn't appear to be a way to prevent this from happening. When managing ndproj files in source control, this could lead to additional updates to the ndproj file whenever references within the projects are added or removed. It would be ideal to have an option to prevent this from happening, with these assemblies always being assessed against the build.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  NDepend Project  ·  Admin →

  7. Support for embedded PDB

    We've moved from portable to embedded PDBs for our .NET projects - this means there is no longer a separate PDB file and the PDB information is embedded in the assembly. Please can NDepend support this so that queries using .PDBFound and NbLinesOfCode etc. continue to work?

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →

  8. Support for builds running inside dockerfiles

    Please support NDepend for builds which are running inside (linux) dockerfiles.

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Build Process Integration  ·  Admin →

  9. Make possible to define groups of namespaces and view dependency graph among them

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Dependency Graph  ·  Admin →

  10. ndepend console should run on .NET Standard for Linux based builders

    We are beginning to move towards linux based builders using a .NET Core environment for our .NET Core projects that are not dependent on windows. Because NDepend is a part of our build process, we cannot run any analysis at build times on the projects that have moved in that direction.

    Make NDepend.Console .NET Core compliant so that it can run on these Linux builders and restore full analysis capability to out builds.

    35 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Build Process Integration  ·  Admin →

  11. Support for Web Sites (WebForms/MVC)

    At this moment it is not intuitive and very hard to analyze Web sites with ndepend will be very nice if I could get site analyzed in few button clicks

    62 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  NDepend Project  ·  Admin →

  12. Ability to export dependency graph as SVG

    It will be very nice if there will be ability to export dependency graph as SVG image rather than PNG, it definitelly will be less in size and as a bonus it will be resizeable without loosing quality

    42 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Dependency Graph  ·  Admin →

  13. NCrunch Code coverage integration.

    NCrunch is an absolute must have tool, and it does code coverage very well. i'd like to see a way to get NCrunch Code Coverage data into NDepend.

    127 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Code Coverage  ·  Admin →

  14. I see you have integration for Reflector, is there any interest in providing a dotPeek integration as well?

    Just an idea

    41 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  5 comments  ·  Admin →

  15. Create an NDepend.CodeModel.IProperty interface

    This would be especially handy to detect with CQLinq when a property is tagged with an attribute, and also to jump from the getter method to the setter method and vice-versa. So IProperty would have to implement the interface NDepend.CodeModel.IAttributeTarget

    75 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Code Model  ·  Admin →

  16. Reference VS solutions from the NDepend Project > Code to Analyze

    In addition to references assemblies to analyze from NDepend project, make possible to reference also one or several VS solutions. Assemblies could then be resolved from a defined VS solutions configuration. Also a filter by name system would be handy to filter for example tests assemblies from the VS solutions.

    24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  NDepend Project  ·  Admin →

  17. Make possible to open fields declaration from rules and queries results

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  UI - Ergonomy  ·  Admin →

  18. If Statements Counted as Local Variables?

    Is NDepend counting if statements as local variables? The number of local variables reported by NDepend is often much higher than what I manually count. In some cases NDepend is reporting 10+ more local variables in addition to the number that are actually declared.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Code Metrics  ·  Admin →

  19. Description and Code for Avoid methods with too many parameters Do Not Match

    The description of rule Avoid methods with too many parameters says "This rule matches methods with more than 8 parameters.". The source code finds all methods with greater than 6 parameters.

    warnif count > 0 from m in JustMyCode.Methods where
    m.NbParameters >= 7

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Code Rule and Query  ·  Admin →

  20. Improve mapping of NDepend issues to Sonarcube

    Currently when using NDepend with SonarCube all critical rules are mapped to blocker issues and all other to major issues.

    Since NDepend 2017 has introduced the same granularity of issue severity as SonarCube has it would make sense to map it using this severity rating instead of using the obsolete critical/none critical rules flag of NDepend.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3
  • Don't see your idea?

NDepend User Voice

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)